Home
No Child Left BehindSearch our Site
4100 Spenard Rd.
Anchorage, AK 99517
(907) 274-0536
About NEA-Alaska
Alaska's Children
Alaska's Future
Government Relations
News & Issues
Legislative Updates
E-Mail your legislator
Membership
Why Join
How to Join
Have you Moved?
For Our Members
Member Benefits
TRS/PERS Retirement
Your Dues Dollars
Teachers
Support Professionals
Teacher Resources
Attorney Referral
Program
Calendar & Conferences
Spotlight on Members
Publications
Grants/Scholarships
Travel Reimbursement
Links
NEA (National)
NEA-Alaska Health Plan
PTA (National)
PTA (Alaska)
State of Alaska
Excellence in Education
Promoting Excellence
Alaska Native Education

No Child Left Behind
Safe Schools
Teaching in Alaska
Rights & Bargaining
News & Issues
Grievances
Protecting Yourself
Contact Us
Board
Staff
Local Affiliates
Excellence in Education


Statewide teacher training mandate nixed

Story Source: Fairbanks Daily News-Miner
By Robinson Duffy
Published 12/08/07

A proposal that would have meant all teachers in Alaska would have to prove they know how to teach reading was voted down by the Alaska State Board of Education on Friday.

The proposal was opposed by a broad swath of educators across the state.  In September, the Fairbanks school board passed a resolution opposing the plan.

The proposal would have mandated that all teachers in Alaska take an online class to teach them how to teach reading.  Alternatively, they could have taken a test showing they already have a grasp on the information covered in the course.

The state board received 522 pages of written comments on the proposal, nearly all of it in opposition to the plan.  The opposition came from teachers, principals, local school districts and school boards including the Fairbanks North Star Borough Board of Education, the Anchorage School District, the Juneau School District and the  Bering Strait School District.

Teachers unions across the state, including the Fairbanks chapter of the National Education Association, opposed the reading course, as did the Alaska State Literacy Association and the College of Education at the University of Alaska Anchorage.

Many of the comments argued that the new regulation was a financial burden on teachers, who would be required to pay for the $900 online reading course.  A number of teachers called the proposed class an insult and an insinuation that they didn't know how to teach reading.  Some suggested that the state should be focused on math or writing as opposed to reading.  Of the three, reading is the area Alaska students score highest on in yearly standardized tests.

"We're doing pretty well in reading," Fairbanks Assistant Superintendent Roxa Hawkins said. "We do a lot of professional development on it already."

Bill Bjork, the president of the Alaska National Education Association, echoed the sentiments of many of those opposed to the reading course when he told the members of the state board during that body's meeting Friday morning in Anchorage, that, if passed, the new regulation would scare prospective teachers away from Alaska.

In order to become a certified teacher in Alaska, Bjork pointed out, candidates already have to pass a standardized test after completing college, as well as take two mandated courses: one in Alaska history, the other in cross-cultural communications.  The reading course, Bjork said, would be one more obstacle.

"They're already coming into the state with one of the worst pension systems in the country," Bjork said. "We must remain competitive.  We want the best and brightest to continue to teach our children."

Steve Laroe, the president of the Fairbanks Education Association, said the special reading course wasn't necessary for most teachers, especially those who didn't exclusively teach reading or at all.  Math teachers should be focused on math, science teachers should be focused on science, he said, and should leave the intense reading instruction to specially trained reading teachers.

"We have reading specialists at the secondary level with whom individual students can work with," he said. "They are well-trained people."

State education officials contended when they proposed the regulation that all teachers are reading teachers since reading is necessary for the understanding of any subject.